As we enter a new era in aerospace development, it’s becoming abundantly clear how digital technologies such as the digital twin and digital thread are helping OEMs revolutionise how things are done across the entire product life cycle.
So, what are the many challenges aerospace OEMs and suppliers face today and how can the industry reduce risk and deliver new avenues of innovation in electrical and electronic content platforms?
The Aerospace Industry
Electronic and electrical design demands of the 21st century will no doubt present a tremendous challenge to aerospace OEMs. Profitability in all phases of platform development is a key concern. Along with staying profit- able, there is a need to constantly innovate. But with innovation comes risk. How do you limit risk to stay profitable?
Today, addressing exposure arising from electrification must be part of the mix. For example, while electronic and electrical content infuse long-term value into plat- forms, they bring new uncertainty to the task of platform integration. Historical platform integration approaches, dominated by processes optimised for the mechanical discipline, must be updated.
Further, aerospace design complexity is compounding dramatically year over year. Now more than ever, design requirements interact across multiple disciplines to impact the product hierarchy across the supply chain, demanding sophisticated implementations and increasing program risk.
Other issues and challenges exacerbating program risk include:
- Greater pressure on profit margins from new competitors
- The need to continuously increase production rates
- An increasing number of government/safety regulations
- New and tighter cost controls
- Greater emphasis on just-in-time, quality deliverables
- The need to re-purpose and re-use – across multiple platforms
- More supply chain collaboration and automation
In order to address these mounting demands – and stay competitive – OEMs are moving toward the digitalisation of the design and integration of electrical and electronic systems. Digitalisation means using digital technology to improve business operations, i.e. to improve the way work gets accomplished across the entire value chain.
Moving to an integrated, digitalised approach, seamlessly exploiting what is known about the product and its production process at any given time, allows manufacturers to achieve a much better balance between innovation and risk. With it, design project teams stand a much better chance of staying within budget and on time. Already, intelligent digital solutions have been successfully deployed in various program domains to design and implement aircraft electrical/electronic systems. This trend will only intensify as electrification takes hold of the future.
Because electronically enabled functions are being introduced into all aspects of the platform, semi-manual development methods of the past are no longer adequate and, in many situations, counterproductive. On a single commercial aircraft today, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of electronic devices/units, miles of electrical wiring, a multitude of configurations to implement and numerous safety and certification requirements to take into consideration. Manual and disjointed hand-off of requirements, work-in-process design data and final product descriptions are no longer an efficient business practice.
“Our partnership with the Siemens-Mentor team will combine best-in-class electrical design tools with Boeing’s vast experience and knowledge in our 2CES transformation of electrical design.” Boeing
Changes in Aerospace
Two major trends shape the aerospace industry today. First, increasing mission demands are escalating platform performance requirements. Whether it’s further extending the range of twin-engine commercial aircraft or enhancing fighter effectiveness using a swarm of remotely con- trolled drones, OEMs demand more mission capability.
The second trend is electrification. More than ever, plat- form developers implement the functionality required to deliver new mission capabilities using electrical solutions. These include electrically enabled capabilities, such as autoland and in-flight entertainment (IFE). Furthermore, electrical approaches are increasingly replacing mechanical, pneumatic and hydraulic implementations of existing functionality. For example, fly-by-wire systems, electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) and combined vision systems (CVS) have become commonplace. In fact, electrical is expected to become the dominant discipline in the future. Why? The benefits range from increased reliability, through increased payload (i.e. reduced function weight), to lower energy demand.
While the industry has made tremendous strides in introducing electronic and electrical systems into modern platforms, with obvious benefits to both the OEM and the end-user, it has driven platform power demand to new levels. Statistics reveal there’s been a 10X increase in power consumption aboard modern aircraft over the past 50 years.
It wasn’t too long ago that major aircraft OEMs were reluctant to install passenger USB ports on commercial aircraft because device recharging had a direct, detrimental effect on the aircraft’s overall power availability. The introduction of increased power generation and integrated electrical solutions made it possible for passengers to plug-in and recharge their personal USB devices from the comfort of their own seat. This real-world example illustrates the ongoing electrical demands. Increased power consumption is a very real and growing concern.
Another implication of the increased use of electrical solutions is the increased size, weight and complexity of the electrical wiring interconnect system (EWIS) that connects them. Let’s examine the case of a typical business jet to get a feel for an EWIS. A business jet can include over 120 independent electrical systems. Its EWIS could easily be composed of 350 harnesses, comprising as many as 30,000 wire segments. This could add up to over 50 miles of wire – and over 100,000 parts.
Increasing platform electrical content has resulted in EWIS weight growing faster than other aircraft elements, now accounting for up to three percent of total platform weight. With the increased use of digital communications, EWIS content has moved from simple point-to-point analog connections to more sophisticated digital buses to enable on-board network data communication. These can require expensive data cables, including high bandwidth fiber, driving EWIS cost and manufacturing complexity. Finally, EWIS complexity is compounded by a myriad of rules to minimise electrical interference, account for hazard zones and of course, ensure certification.
“The Capital solution…will allow our design teams to explore and advance our products via integrated electrical systems architectures. This will bring clear benefits to those who buy and service our products, such as weight and lifecycle cost savings.” Pilatus Aircraft Ltd
Increased complexity means greater potential for failure
Today, it’s not uncommon for a single commercial aircraft to have hundreds of electronic control units, tens or even hundreds of miles of wire and unique configurations throughout all parts of the platform that need to meet numerous certification requirements. With the increase in electrical system content and complexity, a single iteration during design, verification, or compliance can place the entire program in jeopardy. Given the rise in electrification and complexity, moving to an intelligent digitalised solution now may help aerospace OEMs avoid possible calamities in the future. Already, aerospace manufacturers have suffered the consequences:
- A major U.S. aerospace manufacturer had to absorb $1.26 billion in pre-tax accounting losses for wiring issues and damage to a test aircraft’s fuelling system, erasing any profit from the initial deliveries
- One major OEM saw its delivery schedule slip by six months and then experienced a second seven-month delay after the company announced it had been struggling to install wiring into one of its more sophisticated aircraft
- In 2015, another major aircraft manufacturer had to write down more than $4 billion in losses due to program cost overruns, development delays and slow sales – some of these setbacks were directly attributed to the aircraft’s electrical and electronic systems
Ready for an historic disruption
The use of digital technologies will transform the aerospace industry in ways imagined today – and in ways not yet imagined tomorrow. Digitalisation gives rise to an electrical model-based enterprise (MBE) which brings together multiple engineering domains to collaborate effectively up and down the supply chain. MBE allows for the creation of an interconnected and automated value chain, within and extending beyond, the platform OEM. Stakeholders within the OEM ecosystem employ a digital thread, exploiting digital data continuity, to reference a single model of the platform’s electrical system, its digital twin, across the platform’s lifecycle. The three tenets of a model-based enterprise are digitalisation, automation and data re-use.
The value of an interconnected and automated value chain
A model-based approach brings designs, teams and business functions together, achieving the universal goal of innovation and a higher quality of product earlier in the program lifecycle. All parties involved, including first and second tier suppliers, can easily and more accurately collaborate to build something unique and inspirational, rather than spend their time fearing and reacting to errors and the program slips that inevitably result.
Realising the electrical MBE
An aircraft platform consists of multi-domain systems that are carefully integrated to perform the intended functions of its design. Tools with the capability to deliver advanced automation across a flow extending from electrical/electronic architecture definition, through detailed electrical design and wire harness manufacturing, to documentation and diagnostics are essential. These tools need to smoothly integrate with other design disciplines, such as mechanical computer-aided design tools, systems engineering tools and manufacturing/ shop floor systems. They must also be capable of addressing the challenges of engineering change orders, with the goal of reducing the volume of change orders with higher first-time quality achieved via the digital twin.
The emergence of the digital twin and the digital thread
Siemens has been at the forefront of digital twin technol- ogy for many years and has seen widespread adoption across numerous industries including aerospace. A digital twin is a virtual representation of a physical product or business process, which is used to understand and predict outcomes of the physical counterpart. Performance char- acteristics can be tested on the digital twin before the actual implementation begins. Digital twins are used throughout the product lifecycle to simulate, predict and optimize the product and/or production system before committing to a major investment.
By incorporating multi-physics simulation, data analytics and machine learning capabilities, digital twins are able to demonstrate the impact of design changes, production options, usage scenarios, environmental conditions and other endless variables – reducing the need for physical prototypes, compressing development time and improv- ing quality of the final product or process.
The potential applications for a digital twin depend on what stage of the product lifecycle it models. Generally speaking, there are three types of digital twin – product, production and performance.
The combination and integration of the three digital twins as they evolve together is accomplished by the digital thread. The term “thread” is used because it is woven into and brings together data, from all stages of the design, production and operating lifecycles. The digital thread is made possible by employing a software architecture that natively incorporates digital data continuity across the many representations of the product, its production processes and its operating environment.
The digital twin of product, production and performance
A digital twin of product, production and performance provides a core model of the product lifecycle, allowing aerospace teams (and future engineers) to create, iterate, replicate and improve valuable programs. The results are data coherency and stability, integration and advanced automation. This significantly de-risks and streamlines platform electrical system design and integration pro- cesses. The digital twin model also offers clear benefits to those who buy and service aerospace products, including lifecycle cost analysis and savings, faster maintenance turnaround times and greater platform operational availability.
It’s also about feedback up and down and throughout the entire value chain. The digital thread reaches back to the early stages of product design and spreads rich data forward into platform production, maintenance and operation. In essence, designers, fabricators, assemblers, suppliers, maintainers and operators create a full, closed- loop decision environment for continuous optimization throughout all aspects of the value chain during the years of platform development and the decades of platform operation.
For the aerospace industry, the digital twin, digital thread and model-based enterprise deliver the following advantages:
- Reduced risk of cost and schedule overruns
- Improvements in productivity
- Improved technical performance
- Automation of electronic and electrical systems • Increase first-time quality and design efficiency
The digital twin for aerospace allows program leaders to keep commitments to their customers, helps all users keep promises of quality and enables engineering teams to explore and advance highly innovative products.
“Constraints defined early…
maintained throughout the flow
to ensure that the as-built wire
routing meets EWIS mandates.”
Capital: The electrical digital twin and digital thread
Siemens has been working diligently for nearly two decades to enable the model-based enterprise for the electrical discipline. The result is Capital®, a software environment architected upon the principle of digital data continuity and built to capture and enrich the multiple digital twins of the platform electrical system: product, production and operation.
The primary reason to adopt the Capital tool suite is that it reduces the risk program teams face as they design and integrate platform-level electrical systems. Using Capital, teams reduce risk throughout all stages of the product lifecycle and are allowed greater flexibility to innovate.
For example, Capital:
- Communicates changes back and forth across the value chain so that systems engineers, design engineers and manufacturing teams aren’t blind sided by improvements proposed by one of these teams
- Interrogates the electrical system digital twin to report violations to critical compliance rules, such as signal separation, as they occur
- Controls access to critical intellectual property to protect program teams from unauthorised disclosure of information
- Communicates complete MBOMs to manufacturing teams to reduce excess parts inventory kept on hand ‘just-in-case we missed something’ needed to make the EWIS delivery schedule
- With Capital, electrical program teams shift from reacting to risks as they arise to proactively practicing “Program Execution Excellence.”
Further, design project teams using Capital:
- Enrich the digital twin of their electrical system throughout the platform’s lifecycle
- Minimise the need for costly engineering change orders (ECOs)
- Achieve functional and compliant first articles with fewer design/integration/production iterations
- Re-use the information comprising the electrical systems digital twin as they take on the challenge of each lifecycle stage – from definition, through design, into production and throughout its operating life for sustainment
- Accrue productivity advantages across the various program phases
- Reduce the risk faced by electrical programs, enabling them to creatively innovate
- Capital delivers advanced automation across a multi- domain flow extending from E/E architecture definition, through detailed electrical design and wire harness manufacturing, to documentation and diagnostics (figure 3)
- Capital’s features include functional verification, manufacturing work instruction generation and configuration management and design change management
Capital serves all the electrical development phases of a program including:
- Define: Optimises electrical/electronic architectures against targets such as cost and weight
- Design: Maximizes electrical system and wire harness development efficiency and data quality. Provides a comprehensive environment spanning signal connectivity capture, system based and platform level wiring design and harness design and engineering
- Produce: Improves the efficiency of harness design and formboard design. Optimises harness assembly and helps minimize harness cost. Automatically generates work instructions that reflect the harness design
- Maintain: Reduces the cost and improves the accuracy and timeliness of service publications by creating formatted documentation directly from source design data. Provides real-time, adaptive access to platform service information, interactively guiding the service technician to more rapidly complete the repair or maintenance
Rich data modelling and data management are central to Capital, complementing the model-based enterprise strategy. Architected for enterprise deployments, Capital is built to integrate with adjacent disciplines such as requirements capture, mechanical CAD, manufacturing execution and product lifecycle management. IT scalabil- ity, security features and modern computing environments are supported. Capital can be deployed into an Oracle RDBMS environment or implemented using its own embedded database.
90 percent ECO reduction: “Improvement attributed to Capital’s detailed component modeling, extensive design rule checking (DRC) and database stability.”
De-risking key integration milestones: How Capital is helping today
The Capital suite of tools is known for optimizing and streamlining workflows across all domains in aerospace design and manufacturing. A few of the key program milestones Capital helps to de-risk include:
Capital checks to make sure everything is connected as expected. Design rule checks (DRC) ensure logical electri- cal connectivity is correct and the downstream physical piece parts have been defined and support the logical schematic. Furthermore, Capital enables advanced ECAD/ MCAD collaboration to ensure wire harnesses are the correct length given the platform routing.
Production readiness review (PRR)
This milestone indicates a key hand-off from engineering to production/manufacturing. Capital brings together critical elements of this milestone by performing complete physical harness design using data defined in the logical schematic, automatically generating work instruc- tions based on the production floor layout and equip- ment, designing formboards based on customisable placement rules and providing a structured bill of materi- als (SBOM) to the business.
Type certification (TC)
Capital enables customers to demonstrate compliance to applicable regulations. For example, EWIS signal separa- tion can be codified into rules and design constraints from the very beginning of the design process to ensure compliance can be met. Electrical Load Analysis, wire de-rating, voltage drop, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and sneak circuit analysis are additional analyses that support electrical regulations and intended function.
Entry into service (EIS)
De-risking the milestones also de-risks this key program milestone. EIS enables the airline manufacturer to begin making revenue and add profitability to its bottom line, a key objective supported by Capital.
As we enter a new era in aerospace development, it is quite clear digital technologies are revolutionising major industries across the globe. Aerospace electrical systems are no exception. Digitalisation will require a new way to look at familiar challenges along with incorporating new methods to deal with a growing list of complexities – in order to lower risk throughout the entire product lifecycle.
The Capital tool suite from Siemens offers aerospace electrical system developers a significant step forward.
By grounding the electrical discipline in a more integrated and virtual environment, aerospace manufacturers increase engineering team and vendor engagement, improve response times, introduce new technology and innovation, reduce cost of documentation and improve affordability up and down the supply chain through repurpose and re-use.
Most important, engineering teams reduce the probability of being surprised by, i.e. the risk of, an unexpected issue during platform integration that could force a costly iteration, which in turn, could impact budget, schedule and perhaps individual careers.
The E/E tools from Capital provide the only mature, end- to-end digital thread for electrical system design and integration. The tool suite is at the forefront of Program Execution Excellence. It is the only electrical environment that spans the full electrical system value chain – from electrical system definition, through design, into manufacture and finally, to support and maintenance.
To read more about how Boeing is using Capital across its enterprise, see this press release from Siemens. For more information on how Capital is benefiting the aerospace and defence industries, please visit this web page.
If you’d like specific information on the comprehensive suite of Capital tools, visit here.